D.U.P. No. 79-24
Synopsis:
The Director of Unfair Practices declines to issue a complaint with respect to an Unfair Practice Charge filed by an individual which claims that the majority representative's failure to submit a grievance to the terminal step of the contractual grievance procedure violated rights guaranteed by the Act. The Director observes that there is no statutory obligation on the part of a majority representative to process a grievance beyond the initial presentation level of the grievance procedure. The Director further observes that the majority representative's conduct in grievance processing is governed by the standards of fair representation, i.e., that the majority representative's conduct in representing the interests of unit members must not be arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith. The Charging Party did not allege that the majority representative acted in an arbitrary, discriminatory or bad faith manner nor do the facts alleged by the Charging Party support a claim that the majority representative has violated the duty of fair representation.
PERC Citation:
D.U.P. No. 79-24, 5 NJPER 178 (¶10096 1979)
Appellate History:
Additional:
Miscellaneous:
NJPER Index:
71.11 73.113
Issues:
Decisions | WordPerfect | PDF |
| | |
NJ PERC: | . | - DUP 79-024.pdf
|
|
Appellate Division: | | |
|
Supreme Court: | | |
|
|