|
I.R. No. 84-13
Synopsis:
Upon application for interim relief brought by the Charging Party, a designee of the Commission denies the request by Charging Party for an Order directing the Respondent to reinstate certain employees who were discharged by the State of New Jersey Department of Labor after the filing of unfair practice and clarification of unit proceedings before the Commission. The CWA asserts that the State's discharge of the employees was motivated by CWA's institution of the aforementioned proceedings. The State denies that the employee furloughs were motivated by the exercise of any protected rights, but rather were due to a declining number of unemployment claims and a consequent decrease in federal funding levels for the Division of Unemployment and Disability Insurance. In its explanation of the furloughs, the State contested several of the facts upon which Charging Party's unfair practice claims are based. The undersigned is thus unable to conclude that the Charging Party has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success upon the merits of this case and accordingly, the interim relief request was denied.
PERC Citation:
I.R. No. 84-13, 10 NJPER 396 (¶15183 1984)
Appellate History:
Additional:
Miscellaneous:
NJPER Index:
74.373
Issues:
| Decisions | WordPerfect | PDF |
 | | |
| NJ PERC: | . |  - IR 84-013.pdf |
|
| Appellate Division: | | |
|
| Supreme Court: | | |
|
|