Back

D.U.P. No. 94-41

Synopsis:

The Director of Unfair Practices refuses to issue a complaint on a charge brought by Joseph LaBenz, III, against the United Independent Union, alleging he did not receive proper representation on a grievance. LaBenz alleges that on May 21, 1993, he was notified by the union attorney that the union will not proceed further on his grievance. However, LaBenz filed his unfair practice charge on January 25, 1994. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4(c) precludes the Commission from issuing a complaint where an unfair practice charge has not been filed within six months. Accordingly, the charge is out of time.

PERC Citation:

D.U.P. No. 94-41, 20 NJPER 216 (¶25106 1994)

Appellate History:



Additional:



Miscellaneous:



NJPER Index:

23.62 71.13

Issues:

    DecisionsWordPerfectPDF
    NJ PERC:.DUP 94 41.wpd - DUP 94 41.wpdDUP 94-041.pdf - DUP 94-041.pdf

    Appellate Division:

    Supreme Court:



    D.U.P. NO. 94-41 1.
    D.U.P. NO. 94-41
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY
    PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION
    BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF UNFAIR PRACTICES

    In the Matter of

    UNITED INDEPENDENT UNION,

    Respondent,

    -and- Docket No. CI-94-41

    JOSEPH L. LABENZ, III,

    Charging Party.

    Appearances:

    For the Respondent,
    Francis Chippardi, President

    For the Charging Party,
    Joseph L. LaBenz, III, pro se

    REFUSAL TO ISSUE COMPLAINT

    On January 25, 1994, Joseph LaBenz, III, filed an unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission alleging that he did not get proper representation from his employee representative when he grieved a "lateral reassignment" that entailed new work hours.

    LaBenz alleges that on May 21, 1993, he received a letter from the union attorney stating that it was his belief that he did not have a case and the union "will not proceed any further."

    It is apparent from the facts alleged by LaBenz that the union notified him that it would not represent him more than six


    months prior to the filing of his unfair practice charge.1/ N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4(c) precludes the Commission from issuing a complaint where an unfair practice charge has not been filed within six (6) months of the occurrence of any unfair practice, unless the aggrieved person was prevented from filing the charge. See In re North Warren Bd. of Ed., D.U.P. No. 78-7, 4 NJPER 55 (& 4026 1977).

    Therefore, I do not believe that the Commission's complaint issuance standard has been met and decline to issue a complaint on the allegations of this charge. 2/ The charge is dismissed.

    BY ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR

    OF UNFAIR PRACTICES




    Edmund G. Gerber, Director


    DATED: April 13, 1994
    Trenton, New Jersey














    1/ On February 24, 1994, LaBenz sought to amend his charge claiming the union conduct constituted "continuing violation". However, he failed to allege any new facts in support of this position.

    2/ N.J.A.C. 19:14-2.3.

    ***** End of DUP 94-41 *****