Back

D.U.P. No. 85-16

Synopsis:

The Commission Designee declines to issue a complaint where a charge was brought by a P.B.A. unit composed of patrolmen and sergeants protesting the salary award to lieutenants who are outside of the bargaining unit. It was found that the charging party, Eatontown P.B.A. Local 305 has not standing to bring such an action concerning employees outside of its own unit.

PERC Citation:

D.U.P. No. 85-16, 10 NJPER 652 (¶15314 1984)

Appellate History:



Additional:



Miscellaneous:



NJPER Index:

71.14 71.226

Issues:


DecisionsWordPerfectPDF
NJ PERC:.DUP 85-016.wpdDUP 85-016.pdf - DUP 85-016.pdf

Appellate Division:

Supreme Court:



D.U.P. NO. 85-16 1.
D.U.P. NO. 85-16
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION
BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF REPRESENTATION

In the Matter of

BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN,

Respondent,

-and- Docket No. CO-84-307

EATONTOWN P.B.A. LOCAL 305,

Charging Party.

REFUSAL TO ISSUE COMPLAINT

On May 21, 1984, Eatontown P.B.A. Local 305 filed an Unfair Practice Charge alleging that the Borough of Eatontown ( A Borough @ ) violated the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq., specifically ' ' 5.3(a)(5) and (7).

By letter dated September 18, 1984, the Administrator of Unfair Practice Proceedings advised the Petitioner that, since it did not represent the Borough = s superior officers, it appeared that it lacked standing to file the instant charge. In that letter, the Administrator invited the Petitioner to withdraw its charge or to raise further factual or legal issues.

The undersigned has reviewed the Petitioner = s letter of October 8, 1984. It does not raise any issues of fact or law not already considered in this matter.

Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the Administrator = s letter of September 18, 1984, the undersigned declines to issue a complaint in the above matter.

BY ORDER OF COMMISSION DESIGNEE

/s/Edmund G. Gerber

DATED: November 5, 1984
Trenton, New Jersey
***** End of DUP 85-16 *****