Back

L.D. No. 92-3

Synopsis:


PERC Citation:

L.D. No. 92-3

Appellate History:



Additional:



Miscellaneous:



NJPER Index:



Issues:

    DecisionsWordPerfectPDF
    NJ PERC:.LD 92 3.wpd - LD 92 3.wpdLD 92-003.pdf - LD 92-003.pdf

    Appellate Division:

    Supreme Court:



    L.D. NO. 92-3 1.
    L.D. NO. 92-3
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION
    LITIGATION ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM


    In the Matter of

    TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
    Public Employer,

    -and- Docket Nos. CI-L-91-30
    CI-L-91-31

    F.M.B.A. LOCAL 19
    Employee Representative.

    -and-

    JOHN KATINSKY,
    Employee.

    Appearances:

    For the Township:
    Ruderman & Glickman, Attorneys
    Mark Ruderman, Of Counsel

    For FMBA Local 19
    Fox and Fox
    (Dennis Alessi, of Counsel)

    For John Katinsky
    Balk, Oxfeld, Mandell & Cohen
    (Sanford Oxfeld, of Counsel)
    DECISION

    The above-named parties have a dispute concerning the proper salary guide placment of Firefighter John Katinsky. All parties have agreed to submit the issue to the Commission's Litigation Alternative Program and to be bound by the results. Documentary evidence was submitted by the Township. All parties were given an opportunity to respond with additional factual assertions and/or arguments. Letter briefs were filed by all parties.

    The issue before me is,

    "What credit, if any, should John Katinsky have been given for his prior experience in placing him on the contractual salary guide?"


    The Township of Bloomfield ("Township") operates a paid fire department. FMBA Local 19 ("FMBA") is the exclusive representative of the Township's firefighters. The Township and Local 19 were parties to a collective negotiations agreement covering firefighters for the period January 1, 1988, through December 31, 1989. At the time this dispute arose, that agreement was still in effect as the parties had not completed negotiations for its successor. Contract Article 21 provides for salaries for all unit employees pursuant to the Schedule A. This schedule provides, in relevant part:

    Effective January 1, 1989, the following salaries shall be fixed and paid as follows:


    Fire Fighter
    1st year of service $21,053
    2nd year of service 24,190
    3rd year of service 27,324
    4th year of service 30,460
    5th year of service 33,597


    The contract is silent concerning placing new employees on the salary guide or crediting employees for related experience.

    The Township hired John Katinsky as a firefighter on January 22, 1990. He was placed on the first step of the salary guide at the entry level salary of $21,053.


    Katinsky contends that he was entited to be given credit for his past experience as a volunteer firefighter in Wayne Township, and thus that be should have been placed at a higher starting salary.

    The Township submitted records of all firefighters hired over the last ten years. The records show that three other firefighters hired prior to Katinsky also came to Bloomfield with firefighting experience: S. Cooper, a three-year federal firefighter for Lyons Veterans' Hospital, was hired in March, 1984; T. Murphy, a five-year County institutional firefighter was hired in March 1984; and A. Rosamilia, a one-year volunteer firefighter for Nutley Fire Department, was hired in February, 1985. The records also show that, of the 38 firefighters hired in the ten-year period prior to Katinsky's hire, all firefighters, including those with prior experience, were hired at the entry level.


    ANALYSIS

    Terms and conditions of employment can either be set forth in the parties' agreement or found in the parties' past practice. Galloway Tp. Bd. of Ed., v. Galloway Tp. Ed. Assn. , 78 N.J. 25, 48 (1978). Generally, a past practice defining a term and condition of employment is entitled to the same status as a term and condition of employment defined by statute or by the provisions of a collective agreement. Where the agreement is silent or ambiguous on the particular issue in dispute, then past practice controls. County of Sussex, P.E.R.C. No. 83-4, 8 NJPER 431 ( & 13200 1982); Rutgers, The State University, P.E.R.C. No. 82-98, 8 NJPER 300 ( & 13132 1982;

    Barrington Bd. of Ed. , P.E.R.C. No. 81-122, 7 NJPER 240 ( & 12108 1981), appeal dismissed App. Div. Docket No. A-4991-80 (1982).

    Here, there is no provision in the parties' current or expired collective agreements which controls the placement on the salary guide for new employees. The Township is not contractually obligated to give new hirees credit for their prior experience. Where the contract does not cover the issue, we look to the parties' past practice to determine whether a term and condition of employment has been established through the parties' experience. Thus, the kep to whether Katinsky was properly hired at step 1 on the guide is found in the parties' past practice concerning initial guide placement.

    The records show that, at the time the Township hired Katinsky, there was no past practice of crediting employees with prior experience in placing them on the salary guide. To the contrary, the Township never gave employees credit for past experience outside Bloomfield.

    The Township hired another firefighter, Anthony Galioto, in July, 1990, at a higher step on the salary guide. However, even if the hiring of this employee amounted to a deviation from the prior practice, this has no effect on Katinsky or on any other employee


    hired before.1/ Katinsky's salary guide placement was determined by the past practice at the time of his hire, not by subsequent events. When the Township hired Katinsky, it did so in accordance with the then current practice of placing employees at the first step on the guide. Thus, I find that the Township's placement of Katinsky at step one of the guide was proper. 2/

    Susan Osborn, LAP Hearing Officer

    Public Employment Relations Commission

    DATED: November 4, 1991







    1/ Even if Galioto's guide placement amounted to a change in the past practice, the parties may alter or deviate from employment practices from time to time if neither party objects, just as the parties to agree to change contractual terms if both parties agree.

    2/ It should be noted that the FMBA did not act improperly by not grieving Katinsky's hiring rate. Since the Township hired Katinsky consistent with the past practice, there was nothing to grieve. If the FMBA seeks changes in the salary guide or the initial step placement practice, it may do so through negotiations for its successor contract.

    ***** End of LD 92-3 *****