Back

A.B.D. No. 90-10

Synopsis:


PERC Citation:

A.B.D. No. 90-10, 16 NJPER 216 (21089 1990)

Appellate History:



Additional:



Miscellaneous:



NJPER Index:

24.1953

Issues:


DecisionsWordPerfectPDF
NJ PERC:.ABD 90 10.wpd - ABD 90 10.wpdABD 90 10.pdf

Appellate Division:

Supreme Court:



A.B.D. No. 90-10 1.
A.B.D. No. 90-10
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION APPEAL BOARD


APPEAL BOARD DKT. No. AB-88-20
OAL DKT. NO. PRB 5l06-88
SHIRLEY JASPAN,

Petitioner,

v.

COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS
OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1037

Respondent.

Petitioner pro se, Shirley Jaspan,

For respondent, Michael T. Leibig , Esq. (Zwerdling, Paul, Leibig, Kahn, Thompson, Driesen, attorneys) and Steven P. Weissman , Esq., Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO District 1
DECISION AND ORDER

On February l9, 1988, Shirley Jaspan filed a petition of appeal with the Public Employment Relations Commission Appeal Board ("Appeal Board"). The petitioner is employed by the State of New Jersey and is represented in collective negotiations by, but is not a member of, respondent, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO and its affiliate ("CWA"). She pays a representation fee in lieu of dues which is shared by CWA and its affiliate. The petition seeks review of representation fees paid to the CWA and its affiliated locals. An Answer to the petition was filed by the CWA. On July 8,

1988, this matter was transferred to the Office of Administrative Law as a contested case and was assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard J. Murphy. CWA and the petitioner have entered into a settlement. On February 5, 1990, Judge Murphy issued an "Initial Decision-Settlement." He reviewed the terms of the settlement and concluded that it was entered into voluntarily and disposed of all issues in dispute. He approved the settlement and ordered that all parties comply with its terms. Pursuant to N.J.S.A . 52:14B-10, the matter is now before the Appeal Board to affirm, reverse, remand or modify Judge Murphy's order.

We have reviewed the settlement and Judge Murphy's order (attached hereto), pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10, and conclude that his action is correct.


ORDER

The Initial Decision-Settlement of Judge Murphy is hereby affirmed.

BY ORDER OF THE APPEAL BOARD





WILLIAM L. NOTO
Chairman


Chairman Noto and Board Members Dorf and Verhage voted in favor of this decision.



DATED: TRENTON, NEW JERSEY
March l6, l990

***** End of ABD 90-10 *****