H.O. NO. 80-2

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

BEFORE A HEARING OFFICER OF THE

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

In the Matter of

RAHWAY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Public Employer,

-and-	Docket No. CU-79-35

RAHWAY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION,

Petitioner.

Appearances:

For the Public Employer

Leo Kahn, Esq.

For the Petitioner

Zazzali, Zazzali & Whipple, Esqs.

(Albert Kroll, of Counsel)

HEARING OFFICER'S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 2, 1979, a Clarification of Unit Petition was filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission (the "Commission") by the Board of Education of the City of Rahway (the "Board") seeking to exclude certain employees from the collective negotiations unit currently represented by the Rahway Education Association (the "Association").1/ Specifically, the Board seeks to exclude the Chief Clerk Typist in the office of the Assistant Superintendent of Schools from the Association, as a confidential employee within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 34:13A-
3(g).

Pursuant to a Notice Rescheduling Hearing dated May 2, 1979, a hearing was held before the undersigned Hearing Officer on May 7, 1979 in Newark, New Jersey, at which all parties were given an opportunity to examine and cross examine witnesses, to present evidence, and to argue orally. Both parties elected not to file briefs in this matter. Upon the entire record in this proceeding, the Hearing Officer finds:

1.	The Board of Education of the City of Rahway is a Public Employer within the meaning of the Act, and is subject to its provisions and is the employer of the employees included in this proceeding.

2.	The Rahway Education Association is an Employee Representative within the meaning of the Act and is subject to its provisions.

3.	The Board filed the instant Petition seeking to exclude the above named secretarial title, currently occupied by Dolores Jedic, from the existing unit arguing that Jedic performs confidential duties which make her inclusion in the unit inappropriate. On the other hand, the Association maintained that Jedic is not a confidential employee. Accordingly, there is a question concerning the composition of the negotiations unit and the matter is properly before the Hearing Officer for Report and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND

The Association has represented instructional and clerical personnel in the Rahway School District since 1968.2/ Presently there are approximately 33 clerical employees in the district, including CETA employees.3/ In 1974 the Association agreed to exclude the secretaries of the Superintendent and Board Secretary/Business Administrator from the unit; however, the Assistant Superintendent's secretary remained in the Association. At that time, the Assistant Superintendent was primarily responsible for the areas of curriculum and instruction and had only minimal input into the formulation of labor relations policy.4/ However, due to an increase in the volume of work pertaining to labor relations, a decision was made by the Board prior to September, 1978, to divide the responsibility for the formulation and implementation for labor relations policy amongst the three top administrators in the District; the Superintendent, the Business Administrator, and the Assistant Superintendent.5/ A revised job description was promulgated on December 1, 1978, which delegated to the Assistant Superintendent responsibility in the following areas: assisting the Superintendent in the preparation and administration of the budget; assisting the Superintendent in the preparation and research for negotiations and in taking an active part in negotiations; and assisting the superintendent in grievance hearings.6/ A revised job description for the Chief Clerk Typist assigned to the Assistant Superintendent was also issued December 1, 1978 which lists the preparation of the "necessary confidential information and research for the Superintendent in regards to negotiations with the various bargaining units" as one of the Chief Clerk Typist's duties.7/ As a result of the modification of the duties of the Assistant Superintendent and his secretary, the within petition was filed.

FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS

The undersigned notes that the Commission is charged with the responsibility of determining the confidential status of public employees based upon the definition which appears at N.J.S.A. 34:13A-3(g).8/ Thus, in reviewing the record herein, the undersigned must consider whether or not Medic's job functions permit her access to or knowledge of issues involved in the collective negotiations process so as to make her membership in the existing unit, represented by the Association, incompatible with her existing duties.

A number of factors are material in making such a determination. Where the confidential status of a clerical employee is in question, the involvement of the individual to which she or he is assigned in collective negotiations process must be examined.9/ If it is established that such individual performs managerial or confidential functions, then inquiry must be made into the nature of the duties which his or her secretary performs. If the clerical types recommendations regarding negotiations, the disposition of grievances,10/ budgetary allocations, or personnel matters then such employee may be classified as confidential. Other factors which must be considered are whether or not the clerical types the minutes of, or the agenda for private Board sessions, opens confidential correspondence or has access to files containing confidential material.

DISCUSSION

A thorough review of the record reveals that the Assistant superintendent, Nicholas DelMonaco, is intimately involved in the formulation and administration of labor relations policies and that his secretary, in the regular curse of her clerical duties, has access to and handles confidential labor relations materials and can be expected to continue to have access to and knowledge of such materials in the future.

Uncontroverted evidence substantiates that DelMonaco regularly attends negotiations sessions and prepares various reports and memoranda, which Jedic types, for the superintendent and the Board's negotiating team concerning projected salary increases, possible staff reductions and program cuts.11/ During the past year, DelMonaco had major responsibility for the preparation of the 1979-80 budget,12/ a major portion of which was typed by Jedic before it became public knowledge.13/

In addition to his involvement in negotiations and budget preparation, DelMonaco handles grievances relating to curriculum and instruction.14/ Recently, DelMonaco heard a grievance concerning the Board's contractual obligation to supply its physical education staff with uniforms.15/ In relation to this grievance, Jedic researched and compiled certain factual information and prepared a report of her findings for DelMonaco.16/ Moreover, Jedic testified that she researched a grievance pertaining to the work performance of a high school custodian.17/ Her research entailed locating the pertinent files, reviewing the information contained therein, and discussing the matter with the Assistant Superintendent. She has also typed DelMonaco's recommendations to the Superintendent regarding the disposition of a grievance.18/ Record evidence further establishes that Jedic has prepared several reports for arbitration hearings where the withholding of an increment was being contested. Additionally, Jedic files Board responses to grievances prior to their formal adoption at Board meetings.19/

As a result of the Assistant Superintendent's role in the implementation of personnel policies,20/ Jedic has been assigned to type those portions of the Board's private agenda which pertain to personnel matters.21/ While Jedic testified that she would not open mail marked confidential unless she was specifically instructed to do so, the record indicates that Jedic routinely opens all unmarked correspondence, reads it, classifies it and files it.22/ Thus, Jedic might inadvertently obtain confidential information from an unmarked letter. Moreover, record evidence indicates, that Jedic types drafts of Board policies and administrative rules,23/ and that she and the secretaries assigned to the Superintendent and Business Administrator are the only clericals who have access to files containing personnel information.24/

The undersigned has reviewed several cases dealing with clerical positions similar to the one at issue in the instant matter. In In re Cranford Board of Education, supra, the Director of Representation upheld the Hearing Officers findings that the secretaries to the Assistant Superintendent for Personnel were confidential employees since they had typed negotiations related material.25/ In another case In re Bloomfield Board of Education, E.D. No. 77-40, 2 NJPER 194 (1976), the Executive Director affirmed the Hearing Officer's finding that the secretaries to the Superintendent, Board Secretary/Business Administrator, and the Assistant Board Secretary/Director of Buildings and Grounds were confidential employees because they handled material relating to negotiations.

The evidence contained in the record irrefutably establishes that Jedic is regularly assigned to an individual who has an integral role in the formulation and implementation of management policies in the area of labor relations. It is clear that Jedic assists the Assistant Superintendent, who is statutorily designated as a managerial executive,26/ by typing: 1) negotiations related material; 2) sections of private Board agendas; 3) recommendations as to the disposition of grievances; and 4) drafts of Board policies. Moreover, she has access to files containing confidential personnel records and certain grievances. Accordingly, the undersigned finds that the chief Clerk Typist in the office of the Assistant Superintendent performs confidential functions and should be excluded from the existing unit represented by the Rahway Education Association.

RECOMMENDATION

Based upon the entire record and the foregoing discussion, the undersigned Hearing Officer recommends that the Chief Clerk Typist in the office of the Assistant Superintendent be found to

be a confidential employee within the meaning of the Act and therefore inappropriate for inclusion in any negotiations unit.

Respectfully submitted,

Steven P. Weissman

Hearing Officer

DATED:	July 23, 1979

Trenton, New Jersey