D.R. NO. 82-20

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF REPRESENTATION

In the Matter of

STATE OF NEW JERSEY (JERSEY CITY

STATE COLLEGE),

Public Employer,

-and-	Docket No. RO-81-260

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF

LAW ENFORCEMENT & SECURITY OFFICERS,

Petitioner,

-and-

LOCAL 195, INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION

OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL

ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO AND LOCAL 518,

NEW JERSEY STATE MOTOR VEHICLE EMPLOYEES

UNION, SEIU, AFL-CIO

Intervenor.

Appearances:

For the Public Employer,

Office of Employee Relations

(David Collins, Employee Relations Coordinator)

For the Petitioner,

Arnold E. Brown, attorney

For the Intervenor

Rothbard, Harris & Oxfeld, attorneys

(Sanford R. Oxfeld of counsel)

DECISION

On June 4, 1981, a Petition for Certification of Public Employee Representative was filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission (the "Commission") by the International Brotherhood of Law Enforcement and Security Officers (the "Petitioner"), seeking to represent a collective negotiations unit comprised of "All regular full time and part time security officers" employed by the State of New Jersey (Jersey City State College). Local 195, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO ("Local 195") and Local 518, New Jersey State Motor Vehicle Employees Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO ("Local 518"), intervened in this matter on the basis of a current collective negotiations agreement covering the petitioned-for employees.

In accordance with N.J.A.C. 19:11-2.6, the undersigned has caused an administrative investigation to be conducted into the matters involved in the Petition in order to determine the facts.

On the basis of the administrative investigation the undersigned finds as follows:

1. The disposition of this matter is properly based upon the administrative investigation herein, it appearing that no substantial and material factual issues exist which may more appropriately be resolved after an evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 19:11-2.6(b), there is no necessity for a hearing where, as here, no substantial and material factual issues have been placed in dispute by the parties.

2. The State of New Jersey is a public employer within the meaning of the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq. (the "Act"), is the employer of the employees who are subject of this Petition and is subject to the provisions of the Act.

3. International Brotherhood of Law Enforcement and Security Officers; Local 195, International Federations of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO; and Local 518, New Jersey Motor Vehicle Employees Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO are employee representatives within the meaning of the Act and ate subject to its provisions.

4. Petitioner seeks to represent all regular full time and parti time security officers at the Jersey City State College. Local 195/Local 518 is the current exclusive representative of a broad-based statewide negotiations unit of inspections and security personnel in which the petitioned-for employees are included.

5. The State asserts that the petition is untimely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 19:11-2.8.1/ The State has submitted a collective negotiations agreement, [efective] effective July 1, 1979 through June 30, 1981, between it and Local 195/Local 518 to support its claim. In addition, the State opposes the Petition in that the unit sought is less than statewide in scope.

6. Local 195/Local 518 does not consent to a secret ballot election on the basis of a claim that the petitioned-for employees are part of the statewide unit which it currently represents and therefore the unit petitioned-for is inappropriate.

The undersigned, by letter dated September 30, 1981, advised the petitioner that the Commission was in receipt of a written agreement containing the terms and conditions of employment of the petitioned-for employees which is effective July 1, 1979 to June 30, 1981 and that a claim had been asserted that N.J.A.C. 19:11-2.8 precluded the consideration of the Petition. The Petitioner was afforded an opportunity to review the Petition in light of the contract bar claim and to withdraw the instant Petition. Petitioner was advised that in the absence of a written response or the filing of a withdrawal request, the undersigned would dismiss the Petition based upon prima facie evidence of an Agreement constituting a bar to the filing of a Petition. The undersigned has not received a response to this communication nor has the Petition been withdrawn.

Accordingly, based on the above, the undersigned dismisses the instant Petition as untimely filed.

BY ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR

OF REPRESENTATION

__________________________

Carl Kurtzman, Director

DATED: November 2, 1981

Trenton, New Jersey